Clare Lee
Econ 160
Professor Chuck Stull
January 13, 2013
Blog Assignment #1
1.
The recent ongoing survey was initiated by classical homoeopathist
Andreas Bachmair against
a German national health survey conducted by KiGGS involving over 17,000
children up to age 19. This survey indicates that vaccinated children have two
or five times more childhood diseases, illnesses, and allergies than unvaccinated
children.
2.
It is
not mentioned, but it’s added that “none of these studies were picked up by the
MSM (mainstream media). None were funded by the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC) or the World Health Organization (WHO) or any
national or international health agency or medical profession group (http://healthimpactnews.com).”
3.
Yes, the sponsor or
any organizations related to medical issues, especially with vaccinations, they
will have an interest in this result as it will be very controversial.
4.
Sample size was
11,000 respondents, mostly from the USA. The article does not clarify the random sample or
control group either.
5.
It wasn’t very
clear. Rather, it can be seen biased as the article was saying, “of course, none
of the studies were picked up by… None were funded by…”
6.
No, graphs are not
used. So it would have been better if they used graphs to show how much
percentage of respondents was prone to which types of diseases.
< Vaccinated children have up to 500% more disease than unvaccinated children > by PF Louis
Publication: Natural News.com
Date: June 19, 2012
No comments:
Post a Comment